• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home News Archive SOP 98-01 vs. CAS

SOP 98-01 vs. CAS

E-mail Print PDF
Hi Ron, Sorry it’s taken so long to post a reply.  Apogee Consulting, Inc. has been on its annual Fall maintenance shut-down.  Anyway, you are absolutely correct that there is a conflict between SOP 98-01 and CAS regarding what costs may be capitalized for internal-use software.  The DCAA Contract Audit Manual acknowledges this conflict (see 7-104 for example).  So you are in trouble no matter what you do.  Here’s my advice -- 1.  Follow GAAP.  Do not capitalize overhead and G&A. 2.  Quantify the amount of allocable overhead and G&A you are expensing instead of capitalizing.  Evaluate the materiality of that amount.  When evaluating the materiality, note that allowable depreciation will be less than if you followed CAS, but that current period expenses will be higher because of unallocated expenses.  You are looking at the difference between the two methods.  3.  If immaterial, ignore.  You can’t be in noncompliance for an immaterial amount of costs. 4.  If material, seek an advance agreement (see the CAM at 7-104.3 b. for some helpful language). 5.  Consider amending your DS-1 to address capitalized values for development of software for internal use. I trust this is helpful. Regards,  Nick Sanders Principal Consultant Apogee Consulting, Inc.
 

Newsflash

Effective January 1, 2019, Nick Sanders has been named as Editor of two reference books published by LexisNexis. The first book is Matthew Bender’s Accounting for Government Contracts: The Federal Acquisition Regulation. The second book is Matthew Bender’s Accounting for Government Contracts: The Cost Accounting Standards. Nick replaces Darrell Oyer, who has edited those books for many years.